
CHP is
a virtually ideal form of energy from an energy security point of
view:
-
CHP
facilities are relatively small and distributed widely.
-
They
do not offer a high-profile target to potential terrorists.
-
Their
locations in industrial, commercial, residential, and district
energy facilities of many sorts mean they are not physically isolated
and vulnerable, but instead share the security implicit in their
host facilities.
-
Their
locations at the point of need eliminate their vulnerability to
a disruption of the transmission system, and indeed create the
ability to provide emergency power downstream of such a disruption.
-
They
are independently fueled and operated. While they can be centrally
dispatched, they can also be operated independently in the event
of a disruption to central systems.
-
Most
CHP systems utilize natural gas from secure sources, rather than
imported petroleum, but they can also be operated on wood wastes,
coal, or other secure fuels.
- The
efficiency of CHP has a security benefit, since vulnerability to
fuel interruptions is proportionate to fuel consumption.

Distributed
energy resources like CHP reduce electricity infrastructure vulnerability.
CHP installations dispersed across the US together with defensible
major facilities, are less vulnerable than central power plants to
disruption. CHP also generally uses secure natural gas or other domestic
fuels.
CHP can
increase the reliability of a building's power supply - a substantial
advantage in today's changing electricity market and high-tech society.
A highly reliable power supply is vital to some companies' computing,
manufacturing, and research functions. CHP can provide the fabled
"6 nines" of power reliability to the digital economy, as
well as provide cooling to high-tech equipment. The computer chips
that operate industrial processes, telecommunications, Internet communications,
and financial transactions can withstand only 8 milliseconds of power
loss before losing memory.
Facilities
like data centers - the buildings stacked with servers and switches
that power the digital economy - require 6 nines, or 99.9999%, probability
that power will not be interrupted. The electric grid provides only
4 nines, or 99.99%, probability - insufficient reliability for a company
that loses a million dollars a minute when the power goes out. Distributed
energy can avert tremendous financial losses by providing primary
and secondary power on-site and using the grid for backup, according
to Tom Casten in Transforming Electricity.


|
MORE RESOURCES
- Carnegie
Mellon Electricity Industry Center (CEIC) has researched a host
of issues impacting the electric system in the US and abroad. Report
No. CEIC-02-05, "Electricity
and Conflict: Advantages Of A Distributed System" details
a quantitative comparison of the reliability of an electricity system
based on distributed natural-gas fired units to a traditional system
based on large centralized plants. The model shows that the distributed
system can be significantly more reliable under stress. The cost of
electricity for the centralized and distributed systems was calculated.
The cost calculation includes a heat credit for cogeneration in the
distributed case and the social costs due to reliability degradation.
|